Christian's QCAs
msgbartop
Questions, comments & assertions about life
msgbarbottom

13 Dec 09 On Disrupting Your Own Technology

I don’t like shopping, but the one kind I will tolerate is hunting for tech goodies. Couple that with Black Friday deals from the comfort of my own laptop, and I’m all over it. This year, my little bro and I bought my dad a beautiful 42″ Sharp LCD 1080p TV. This of course necessitated discussions of replacing the current disc player in our family room, which, believe it or not, is actually a dual DVD/VHS player.

We were looking around at Blu-ray players, comparing and contrasting their up-converting abilities, cost, etc. One thing we talked about as a feature was WiFi/Internet-enabled Blu-ray players. This struck me as a strange idea. The advantage is, as advertised, the ability to stream content directly to the device from Amazon, NetFlix and other services. The attraction from the consumer’s standpoint is obvious (more media, in more ways) but it is a counter-intuitively strong move by manufacturers.

It is, in short, a great example of disrupting your own tech advantage, a message hammered home to me this summer by David S. Rose at Singularity University. He gave the example of Amazon disrupting big-box physical book stores like Barnes & Noble, and then even further disrupting their own very successful model (and margins) with e-book delivery via the Kindle.

But I’d say that the Blu-ray example could prove to be even more lucrative. By positioning themselves directly between the consumer and the content regardless if the data is coming from a disc or streamed off the Web, Sony et al. are ensuring that when the tipping point in data delivery arrives, they’ll be there.

There is a story in today’s New York Times about falling Blu-ray prices which touches upon the tension:

…Blu-ray manufacturers have placed themselves in a seemingly awkward position: They are selling a device that relies on people to continue to buy discs, but the same device gives them a way to download videos — bypassing the discs the machines were built to play.

But, as the article goes on the point out, this is not all bad. In fact, in my opinion, it is the kind of long-sighted planning which despite being rather rare nowadays, should pay dividends.

Compare this move to the current player in our house: it is tempting to say these are parallel examples, of devices simply looking to bridge the gap as the world moves from one standard (VHS) to another (DVD) — and now to a third (Blu-ray).

But that overlooks something very basic and very crucial: the VHS/DVD combo player was reactionary. It was something which grew out of the need to give people a way to watch both their home movies stored on VHS as well as their newest releases coming out on DVD.

The Web-enabled Blu-ray player is an entirely different set-up: it is an attempt to jump the gun (and to disrupt the Blu-ray market) just as the market itself is maturing. Only now are prices falling near the “impulse purchase” range of $100, according to the president of the Blu-ray trade group. And the mainstream switch to streamed delivery is not due for a number of years. But there it is, right now, the WiFi Blu-ray player, available at your local Best Buy, and for cheaper now than ever.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

05 Dec 09 MySpace, Times Skimmer and Your Video of the Day

Techmeme leads today with what it should: a fascinating look at MySpace in the context of its acquisition by News Corp. The article looks at the demise of MySpace at the hands of Facebook, of course, but it’s about a lot more than that.

The New York Times today is promoting on its homepage the Times Skimmer. It’s a neat way of viewing the news on your screen in as close of a way to print as possible. It reminds me of FastFlip, and while it’s cool, I’m not sure I’ll be switch anytime soon. Maybe it’s just because I’ve taught my eyes to jump across the text on the regular lay-out, or maybe it’s because I don’t miss the old print-style format all that much.

This tangentially reminds me of a conversation I had this week with my roommate. After coming back from work we sat down in front of the TV to watch the Civil War. He commented that he spends a LOT of time in front of an LCD screen. We click around during working hours, come back to our apartment and watch sports and then even before we go to bed, we set our alarms on our phones. It wasn’t so much a sad revelation as it was simply a truthful statement, but it got me thinking from a Singularity perspective: What happens as we spend more and more of our time in front of screens? I’m not talking about the classic passive-active discussion about watching the boob tube (or YouTube). That’s not even it. I mean, from a physiological perspective, what are we heading towards?

Perhaps we’ll all soon have AR in our contact lenses and render the need to stare at a liquid crystal display moot. Perhaps not. But I do think a great number of non-trivial, and increasing, hours in the day for a great number of global citizens (in the developed world) are being spent in front of a screen, and that will mean some big changes for us.

I leave you with your video of the day, and what a gem it is. Behold, the ultimate in mash-ups: “Poker Face” performed by Lady Gaga…and Cartman and Christopher Walken:

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,